skip navigation
Download The Article

What the New Mortality Tables Mean to Your Defined-Benefit Plan

Michael J. Bazdarich, PhD
Product Manager/ Economist


Executive Summary

  • Coming changes to actuarial mortality tables will raise a typical DB plan’s liability valuation by something in the neighborhood of 6%–8%.
  • Since mortality rates will drop most sharply for older beneficiaries, the duration of plans’ liabilities will increase, especially the key-rate-durations of long-dated cash flows.
  • While plans’ natural inclination to the changed mortality rates would be to shift to more aggressive asset allocations, they might do well to rethink this response, given the heightened risks associated with such action, thanks to the higher durations of liabilities.
  • An alternative response would be to increase cash contributions, possibly even increasing plan assets’ duration.
  • The appropriate combination of increased cash contributions and changes in asset allocation will depend on each plan’s assessment of its own unique features and appetite for risk.

A Defined-Benefit (DB) pension plan’s obligations to its beneficiaries are estimated by applying assumed mortality rates to the plan’s census of beneficiaries, both active and retired. As one would guess, the longer beneficiaries can be expected to survive and collect benefits, the larger will be the liabilities of the plan, and, so, the lower the funded status. The American Society of Actuaries (SOA) has announced that it will introduce new mortality projections this year and that these projections will result in longer projected life expectancies for most cohorts. We analyze here the effects of those changes and discuss strategies plan sponsors might take to cope with the coming changes.

Scales RP-2000, AA, and BB Giving Way to MP-2014 and RP-2014. Life expectancy has been steadily increasing in the US over the last century, so much so that mortality tables based on past experience can be expected to overstate future mortality rates and thus understate future longevity. As this has been the case for some time, the SOA has taken to publish mortality improvement tables, tables that prompt actuaries to determine how much they should reduce projected mortality rates below what is indicated by existing mortality tables proper. Presently, the SOA members utilize RP-2000 mortality tables, enhanced with mortality improvement rates known as Scale AA.

In 2012, the SOA announced the intention to shift to a Scale BB that featured even faster improvements in mortality than did Scale AA1. In announcements early this year, it further upgraded Scale BB to an enhanced improvement scale called MP-2014, and it also introduced new, base mortality tables RP-20142. When both these tools are fully implemented by actuaries, assumed mortality rates will be much lower than previously, resulting in substantial increases in DB liability valuations and similar declines in funded status.

That’s not all. As it happens, most of the coming decline in mortality rates will be for very old beneficiaries. That is, while projected mortality rates for young workers will be only slightly different, those for older workers and for retired “annuitants” will be more significantly higher. And even more importantly, mortality rates will be assumed to decline even more rapidly in the future, so that life expectancy for a person who will be, say, 85 in 2025, will increase even more than that for someone who is 85 today.

Exhibit 1
Percent Change in Due Value of Annuity for Male Beneficiaries by Current Age*
* Shown are estimated effects of change from RP-2000 with scale AA to RP-2014 with scale MP=2014
Source: Society of Actuaries (2014-1) Table 1.1 etc.

A Defined-Benefit (DB) pension plan’s obligations to its beneficiaries are estimated by applying assumed mortality rates to the plan’s census of beneficiaries, both active and retired. As one would guess, the longer beneficiaries can be expected to survive and collect benefits, the larger will be the liabilities of the plan, and, so, the lower the funded status. The American Society of Actuaries (SOA) has announced that it will introduce new mortality projections this year and that these projections will result in longer projected life expectancies for most cohorts. We analyze here the effects of those changes and discuss strategies plan sponsors might take to cope with the coming changes.

Scales RP-2000, AA, and BB Giving Way to MP-2014 and RP-2014. Life expectancy has been steadily increasing in the US over the last century, so much so that mortality tables based on past experience can be expected to overstate future mortality rates and thus understate future longevity. As this has been the case for some time, the SOA has taken to publish mortality improvement tables, tables that prompt actuaries to determine how much they should reduce projected mortality rates below what is indicated by existing mortality tables proper. Presently, the SOA members utilize RP-2000 mortality tables, enhanced with mortality improvement rates known as Scale AA.

In 2012, the SOA announced the intention to shift to a Scale BB that featured even faster improvements in mortality than did Scale AA1. In announcements early this year, it further upgraded Scale BB to an enhanced improvement scale called MP-2014, and it also introduced new, base mortality tables RP-20142. When both these tools are fully implemented by actuaries, assumed mortality rates will be much lower than previously, resulting in substantial increases in DB liability valuations and similar declines in funded status.

That’s not all. As it happens, most of the coming decline in mortality rates will be for very old beneficiaries. That is, while projected mortality rates for young workers will be only slightly different, those for older workers and for retired “annuitants” will be more significantly higher. And even more importantly, mortality rates will be assumed to decline even more rapidly in the future, so that life expectancy for a person who will be, say, 85 in 2025, will increase even more than that for someone who is 85 today.

Exhibit 2
Time Profile of Typical DB Plan Liabilities & Stylized Description of Changes from New Mortality Tables
Source: Western Asset

A Defined-Benefit (DB) pension plan’s obligations to its beneficiaries are estimated by applying assumed mortality rates to the plan’s census of beneficiaries, both active and retired. As one would guess, the longer beneficiaries can be expected to survive and collect benefits, the larger will be the liabilities of the plan, and, so, the lower the funded status. The American Society of Actuaries (SOA) has announced that it will introduce new mortality projections this year and that these projections will result in longer projected life expectancies for most cohorts. We analyze here the effects of those changes and discuss strategies plan sponsors might take to cope with the coming changes.

Scales RP-2000, AA, and BB Giving Way to MP-2014 and RP-2014. Life expectancy has been steadily increasing in the US over the last century, so much so that mortality tables based on past experience can be expected to overstate future mortality rates and thus understate future longevity. As this has been the case for some time, the SOA has taken to publish mortality improvement tables, tables that prompt actuaries to determine how much they should reduce projected mortality rates below what is indicated by existing mortality tables proper. Presently, the SOA members utilize RP-2000 mortality tables, enhanced with mortality improvement rates known as Scale AA.

In 2012, the SOA announced the intention to shift to a Scale BB that featured even faster improvements in mortality than did Scale AA1. In announcements early this year, it further upgraded Scale BB to an enhanced improvement scale called MP-2014, and it also introduced new, base mortality tables RP-20142. When both these tools are fully implemented by actuaries, assumed mortality rates will be much lower than previously, resulting in substantial increases in DB liability valuations and similar declines in funded status.

That’s not all. As it happens, most of the coming decline in mortality rates will be for very old beneficiaries. That is, while projected mortality rates for young workers will be only slightly different, those for older workers and for retired “annuitants” will be more significantly higher. And even more importantly, mortality rates will be assumed to decline even more rapidly in the future, so that life expectancy for a person who will be, say, 85 in 2025, will increase even more than that for someone who is 85 today.

Exhibit 3
Possible Responses to and Consequences of Effects of New Mortality Tables
Source: Western Asset

A Defined-Benefit (DB) pension plan’s obligations to its beneficiaries are estimated by applying assumed mortality rates to the plan’s census of beneficiaries, both active and retired. As one would guess, the longer beneficiaries can be expected to survive and collect benefits, the larger will be the liabilities of the plan, and, so, the lower the funded status. The American Society of Actuaries (SOA) has announced that it will introduce new mortality projections this year and that these projections will result in longer projected life expectancies for most cohorts. We analyze here the effects of those changes and discuss strategies plan sponsors might take to cope with the coming changes.

Scales RP-2000, AA, and BB Giving Way to MP-2014 and RP-2014. Life expectancy has been steadily increasing in the US over the last century, so much so that mortality tables based on past experience can be expected to overstate future mortality rates and thus understate future longevity. As this has been the case for some time, the SOA has taken to publish mortality improvement tables, tables that prompt actuaries to determine how much they should reduce projected mortality rates below what is indicated by existing mortality tables proper. Presently, the SOA members utilize RP-2000 mortality tables, enhanced with mortality improvement rates known as Scale AA.

In 2012, the SOA announced the intention to shift to a Scale BB that featured even faster improvements in mortality than did Scale AA1. In announcements early this year, it further upgraded Scale BB to an enhanced improvement scale called MP-2014, and it also introduced new, base mortality tables RP-20142. When both these tools are fully implemented by actuaries, assumed mortality rates will be much lower than previously, resulting in substantial increases in DB liability valuations and similar declines in funded status.

That’s not all. As it happens, most of the coming decline in mortality rates will be for very old beneficiaries. That is, while projected mortality rates for young workers will be only slightly different, those for older workers and for retired “annuitants” will be more significantly higher. And even more importantly, mortality rates will be assumed to decline even more rapidly in the future, so that life expectancy for a person who will be, say, 85 in 2025, will increase even more than that for someone who is 85 today.

Endnotes

  1. See Society of Actuaries (2012) “Mortality Improvement Scale BB Report,” and Society of Actuaries (2013) “Questions and Answers Regarding Mortality Improvement Scale BB.”
  2. Society of Actuaries (2014-1) “Exposure Draft RP-2014 Mortality Tables” and Society of Actuaries (2014-2) “Exposure Draft Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2014.”
  3. In Society of Actuaries (2012), P. 4, the SOA estimated that the switch from scale AA to scale BB would raise liability valuations by something like 2% to 4%. The estimates cited in the text include, in addition, the effects of the switch from RP-2000 to RP-2014 and from scale AA to MP-2014.
  4. This is so since ERISA plans use corporate bond yields to evaluate benefit obligations. For public DB plans, the relevant discount rate is the expected rate of return on assets. As this rate need not be directly related to interest rate levels, public plans will not face increased liability duration per se, but their liabilities will be more sensitive to changes in return assumptions.
  5. Under the current combination of FAS 87 and FAS 158, changes in actuarial assumptions such as those due to RP-2014 and MP-2014 have full, immediate impact on the plan sponsor’s balance sheet. However, the impact on the income statement is amortized over a period equal to the average life expectancy of beneficiaries. Since scales RP-2014 and MP-2014 will increase average life expectancies, they will actually lengthen the period over which the costs of their effects can be amortized.
  6. For a more detailed account of these points, see “Don’t Sweat the Small Stuff,” a March 2014.
  7. This issue is analyzed in detail in “Effective LDI: Keeping Up With Your Liabilities,” October 2013.
© Western Asset Management Company, LLC 2025. The information contained in these materials ("the materials") is intended for the exclusive use of the designated recipient ("the recipient"). This information is proprietary and confidential and may contain commercially sensitive information, and may not be copied, reproduced or republished, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of Western Asset Management Company ("Western Asset").
Past performance does not predict future returns. These materials should not be deemed to be a prediction or projection of future performance. These materials are intended for investment professionals including professional clients, eligible counterparties, and qualified investors only.
These materials have been produced for illustrative and informational purposes only. These materials contain Western Asset's opinions and beliefs as of the date designated on the materials; these views are subject to change and may not reflect real-time market developments and investment views.
Third party data may be used throughout the materials, and this data is believed to be accurate to the best of Western Asset's knowledge at the time of publication, but cannot be guaranteed. These materials may also contain strategy or product awards or rankings from independent third parties or industry publications which are based on unbiased quantitative and/or qualitative information determined independently by each third party or publication. In some cases, Western Asset may subscribe to these third party's standard industry services or publications. These standard subscriptions and services are available to all asset managers and do not influence rankings or awards in any way.
Investment strategies or products discussed herein may involve a high degree of risk, including the loss of some or all capital. Investments in any products or strategies described in these materials may be volatile, and investors should have the financial ability and willingness to accept such risks.
Unless otherwise noted, investment performance contained in these materials is reflective of a strategy composite. All other strategy data and information included in these materials reflects a representative portfolio which is an account in the composite that Western Asset believes most closely reflects the current portfolio management style of the strategy. Performance is not a consideration in the selection of the representative portfolio. The characteristics of the representative portfolio shown may differ from other accounts in the composite. Information regarding the representative portfolio and the other accounts in the composite are available upon request. Statements in these materials should not be considered investment advice. References, either general or specific, to securities and/or issuers in the materials are for illustrative purposes only and are not intended to be, and should not be interpreted as, recommendation to purchase or sell such securities. Employees and/or clients of Western Asset may have a position in the securities or issuers mentioned.
These materials are not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal, tax, investment or other advice. The recipient should consult its own counsel, accountant, investment, tax, and any other advisers for this advice, including economic risks and merits, related to making an investment with Western Asset. The recipient is responsible for observing the applicable laws and regulations of their country of residence.
Founded in 1971, Western Asset Management Company is a global fixed-income investment manager with offices in Pasadena, New York, London, Singapore, Tokyo, Melbourne, São Paulo, Hong Kong, and Zürich. Western Asset is a wholly owned subsidiary of Franklin Resources, Inc. but operates autonomously. Western Asset is comprised of six legal entities across the globe, each with distinct regional registrations: Western Asset Management Company, LLC, a registered Investment Adviser with the Securities and Exchange Commission; Western Asset Management Company Ltda. is regulated by Comissão de Valores Mobiliários; Western Asset Management Company Pty Ltd ABN 41 117 767 923 is the holder of the Australian Financial Services License 303160; Western Asset Management Company Pte. Ltd. Co. Reg. No. 200007692R is a holder of a Capital Markets Services License for fund management and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore; Western Asset Management Company Ltd, a registered Financial Instruments Business Operator and regulated by the Financial Services Agency of Japan; and Western Asset Management Company Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA") (FRN 145930). This communication is intended for distribution to Professional Clients only if deemed to be a financial promotion in the UK as defined by the FCA. This communication may also be intended for certain EEA countries where Western Asset has been granted permission to do so. For the current list of the approved EEA countries please contact Western Asset at +44 (0)20 7422 3000.