skip navigation


Stay up to date on timely topics and market events. Subscribe to our Blog now.

April 11, 2019

Does Herman Cain’s Fed Board Nomination Matter?

By John L. Bellows, PhD

Stay up to date on timely topics and market events. Subscribe to our Blog now.

Herman Cain clearly has President Trump’s confidence, but it’s yet to be seen whether a more skeptical Senate will vote for his confirmation to the Federal Reserve Board (the Fed Board). The prospects for Mr. Cain’s confirmation are in constant flux. The financial press corps is obligingly keeping us updated as a parade of politicians and investors rush to share their views on both the man and the merits of his nomination.

We’re not sure it matters all that much one way or the other. Even if the Senate were to confirm both Mr. Cain and Stephen Moore, the President’s other recent suggestion for the Fed Board, the two advocates for rate cuts would still fall well short of forming a majority on the seven-member Board. It would matter if they ever did reach a majority. Paul Volcker resigned after a majority of the Fed Board voted against his interest rate policy in 1986. Ben Bernanke has reported that he was forced into tapering in 2013 because a majority of the Fed Board had become skeptical of quantitative easing. But, in order for Mr. Cain and Mr. Moore to be in the majority, they would need to convince two existing Fed Board members to join them in calling for rate cuts. This seems unlikely at the moment, given that just last month all five existing Fed Board members said that they prefer to leave rates unchanged.

One thing we can be reasonably sure of is that this will not be President Trump’s last foray into discussing monetary policy. To the contrary, President Trump seems to be escalating his rhetoric on the subject. Last week he paired his support for Mr. Cain with a call to restart quantitative easing. This pattern is likely to continue into next year. It would not surprise us if President Trump were to start making even more direct comments about what the Fed will look like after Chair Powell’s term ends in 2022. Yes, 2022 may seem far off, but the stakes are high and a closely fought Presidential election could sharpen the focus on the Fed.

Does the President’s continued focus on the Fed matter? Well, it depends on the environment. In 1972, President Nixon famously pressured Fed Chair Arthur Burns to ease policy ahead of the November election. While not the only factor influencing policy that year, it’s probably safe to say that Nixon’s pressure contributed to policy being looser than it should have been. That was an environment when the President’s priority (more job growth) was at odds with what the Fed should have been doing (controlling inflation). In contrast, today both the President and the Fed have more or less the same objective: protect and sustain the US recovery. Any disparity between their respective preferred policies is just a matter of degree. The thing to watch going forward will be whether or not those differences evolve into something more directly in conflict with each other. Mr. Cain’s personal fate is unlikely to matter much on that score.

© Western Asset Management Company, LLC 2022. This publication is the property of Western Asset and is intended for the sole use of its clients, consultants, and other intended recipients. It should not be forwarded to any other person. Contents herein should be treated as confidential and proprietary information. This material may not be reproduced or used in any form or medium without express written permission.
Past results are not indicative of future investment results. This publication is for informational purposes only and reflects the current opinions of Western Asset. Information contained herein is believed to be accurate, but cannot be guaranteed. Opinions represented are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security and are subject to change without notice. Statements in this material should not be considered investment advice. Employees and/or clients of Western Asset may have a position in the securities mentioned. This publication has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on this information, you should consider its appropriateness having regard to your objectives, financial situation or needs. It is your responsibility to be aware of and observe the applicable laws and regulations of your country of residence.
Western Asset Management Company Distribuidora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários Limitada is authorized and regulated by Comissão de Valores Mobiliários and Brazilian Central Bank. Western Asset Management Company Pty Ltd ABN 41 117 767 923 is the holder of the Australian Financial Services Licence 303160. Western Asset Management Company Pte. Ltd. Co. Reg. No. 200007692R is a holder of a Capital Markets Services Licence for fund management and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Western Asset Management Company Ltd is a registered Financial Instruments Business Operator and regulated by the Financial Services Agency of Japan. Western Asset Management Company Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) (FRN 145930). This communication is intended for distribution to Professional Clients only if deemed to be a financial promotion in the UK as defined by the FCA. This communication may also be intended for certain EEA countries where Western Asset has been granted permission to do so. For the current list of the approved EEA countries please contact Western Asset at +44 (0)20 7422 3000.