skip navigation

Blog

MARKETS
August 09, 2019

Chinese State-Owned Enterprises—The Case for Differentiation

By Jie Peng

Offshore debt issuance by Chinese State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) has witnessed a phenomenal rise, making it too significant to ignore. Over the past decade, USD-denominated debt issued by the country’s SOEs has increased by more than 10-fold, reaching a market capitalization of $145 billion. The expansion has been driven by overseas M&A transactions, a desire to diversify funding sources, as well as the lower cost of funding. The scope of business for these SOEs spans major sectors, including resources (energy and metals & mining), infrastructure (transportation and utilities) and others (food and property). Given the dominance of the state’s hand in steering economic policies, SOEs are therefore intertwined with the country’s macro cycle.

With more new entrants in the offshore debt market, the concept of what constitutes an SOE has inadvertently become more elusive. Historically, Chinese SOE debt issuers are comprised almost exclusively of strategic national entities that are 100%-owned by the central government. Apart from policy banks, these companies include oil firms (e.g., China National Petroleum Corporation and China Petrochemical Corporation) and utilities (e.g., State Grid Corporation of China). Over time, however, ties to the state have evolved into a spectrum of varying official support, reflecting unique standalone features among first-time SOE issuers. These differences include the magnitude of influence (100%, majority or partially owned), the type of owner (central government, agency or local), as well as the structure of security (direct issuance, onshore parent guarantee or keepwell undertaking).

All else being equal, the importance of bottom-up analysis cannot be overstated, particularly for SOE credits without systemic significance at the national level. While none of the Chinese SOE bonds have an explicit government guarantee, most if not all Chinese SOEs receive direct or implicit backing. This is often reflected in the multiple-notch uplift on their standalone credit ratings. Despite a widely held belief of sovereign backstop in times of financial stress, we believe the extent and timeliness of state support can vary considerably across SOEs. The Qinghai Provincial Investment Group, which failed to make a timely coupon payment earlier this year, provides a case in point. Two decades ago, at the height of the Asian financial crisis, an investment trust company in China wholly owned by provincial government defaulted on its offshore debt.

Given ongoing reforms that will subject SOEs to greater market scrutiny, credit differentiation will most definitely gain traction going forward. We remain wary of exposure to peripheral SOE credits in non-strategic competitive sectors, such as property and metals & mining. We would also steer clear of companies with minimal publicly available information, as this exposes the investor to “black hole” risk. On the other hand, core SOEs can serve as an appealing proposition for the global investor seeking high-quality diversification outside of developed markets. Our expectation is that large central SOEs with strong financial metrics should stay resilient through the full business cycle, and are less susceptible to a further escalation in the US-China trade spat given their large domestic-oriented operations. Valuation-wise, top-notch A+ rated credits are attractive in the context of the current low-rate, yield-starved environment. To illustrate, Chinese oil SOEs compare favorably, currently trading 30-40 bps wide of DM peers such as British Petroleum and ConocoPhillips.

Exhibit 1: Phenomenal Rise of USD-Denominated China SOE Bonds Over the Past Decade
Phenomenal Rise of USD-Denominated China SOE Bonds Over the Past Decade
Source: Bank of America Merrill Lynch, as of 31 Dec 2018. Select the image to expand the view.
© Western Asset Management Company, LLC 2019. This publication is the property of Western Asset and is intended for the sole use of its clients, consultants, and other intended recipients. It should not be forwarded to any other person. Contents herein should be treated as confidential and proprietary information. This material may not be reproduced or used in any form or medium without express written permission.
Past results are not indicative of future investment results. This publication is for informational purposes only and reflects the current opinions of Western Asset. Information contained herein is believed to be accurate, but cannot be guaranteed. Opinions represented are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security and are subject to change without notice. Statements in this material should not be considered investment advice. Employees and/or clients of Western Asset may have a position in the securities mentioned. This publication has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on this information, you should consider its appropriateness having regard to your objectives, financial situation or needs. It is your responsibility to be aware of and observe the applicable laws and regulations of your country of residence.
Western Asset Management Company Distribuidora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários Limitada is authorised and regulated by Comissão de Valores Mobiliários and Banco Central do Brasil. Western Asset Management Company Pty Ltd ABN 41 117 767 923 is the holder of the Australian Financial Services Licence 303160. Western Asset Management Company Pte. Ltd. Co. Reg. No. 200007692R is a holder of a Capital Markets Services Licence for fund management and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Western Asset Management Company Ltd is a registered Financial Instruments Business Operator and regulated by the Financial Services Agency of Japan. Western Asset Management Company Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”). This communication is intended for distribution to Professional Clients only if deemed to be a financial promotion in the UK and EEA countries as defined by the FCA or MiFID II rules.