Emerging Markets Local Debt: A Paradigm Lost?

Chia-Liang Lian
Head of Emerging Markets Debt

Executive Summary

  • The paradigm of long term EM debt investing remains intact, as fundamental improvements reassert themselves, albeit with greater differentiation across countries.
  • While a Chinese soft landing scenario is supportive of EM technicals, EM local debt will unlikely be based narrowly on a monolithic theme of Chinese demand for commodities going forward.
  • The case for investing in EM local debt is compelling, given the diversification benefit and valuation appeal.

The experience of investing in emerging markets (EM) local debt over the past 3 years has been analogous to that of peeling an onion. It has not been for the faint of heart; as layers were being pulled back, it has been a constant battle to hold back tears. Investors in this asset class have truly experienced a “perfect storm.”

The first wave was induced by the Federal Reserve (Fed) in mid-2013, when the Fed took a more hawkish tone in its communiqué. The waves that followed accentuated the market downdraft and left global investors clamoring for US dollars. Escalating geopolitical tensions in Russia and a progressive unfolding of corporate scandals in Brazil have cost the two countries their investment-grade sovereign ratings. Slower growth in China translated to a prolonged slump in commodity prices affecting the current accounts of most EM countries. Finally, to make matters worse, a move by Beijing to adjust the Chinese yuan (CNY) in August 2015 stoked hard landing fears in China.

The cumulative impact on EM local bonds is evidenced by its longest losing streak since its inception as a mainstream asset class at the turn of the millennium. Using the J.P. Morgan Global Bond Index-Emerging Markets Global Diversified (GBI-EM GD) as a reference benchmark, EM local debt posted 3 consecutive years of negative absolute returns, at an annualized -10% between 2013 and 2015. The dismal returns defied the familiar narrative of fundamental improvements across the EM complex, a paradigm upon which the very basis of EM investing rests. Indeed, this marked a stark contrast with the experience in the preceding decade, when the Index nearly tripled in value (Exhibit 1).

Exhibit 1
Historically High Correlation Between EM Local Debt and China
emerging-markets-local-debt-a-paradigm-lost-2016-04
Source: JP Morgan, Bloomberg and Western Asset Analysis. As of 31 Mar 16.
*The metal composite consists of lead, zinc, nickel, tin, copper, aluminum and iron

Looking back, one primary source of EM volatility can be traced to China’s outsized, infrastructure-led GDP expansion following its World Trade Organization accession in 2001. Within a decade, Chinese GDP quadrupled in size, thanks to massive infrastructure construction that helped catapult the economy to the league table of the world’s ultra-large economies. This had at least two major implications on EM.

First, China helped fuel a global commodity boom that brought EM countries to the world’s center stage. So relentless was China’s demand for primary imports that trade and fiscal balances in some commodity-reliant Latin American countries flipped from deficit to surplus. One unintended consequence, however, was the failure of some policymakers to attribute the macro tailwinds to exogenous demand-side factors. More damningly, this likely had an effect of diluting the urgency and incentive for these countries to pursue domestic structural reforms.

Second, given limited foreign access to onshore opportunities in Chinese markets, portfolio flows were inadvertently diverted to local markets of its key EM beneficiaries, primarily in Latin America, in the years prior to 2011 (Exhibit 1). This trend was reinforced by dislocations in developed markets during the 2008-09 global financial crisis. The resulting build-up in EM exposure in prior years by strategic and short-term players alike as a proxy to express the Chinese growth provided the technical froth for a sharp retracement.

The issue is whether the traumatic experience of the recent 3 years should be viewed as sufficient proof that the basis for EM investing was flawed. We are not in this camp, for a few reasons.

  • Chinese Soft Landing: Regarding the medium-term growth trajectory in China, Western Asset is firmly in the soft-landing camp, and anticipates annual growth to moderate toward 5%-6% (see Q&A: An Update on China by Desmond Soon, March 2016). The transition path from manufacturing to services will undoubtedly be bumpy. However, China’s profound influence on international commerce and financial markets will continue to be felt. In world trade, China is morphing from a producer to a consumer. The official inclusion of the CNY later this year as the fifth currency in the International Monetary Fund Special Drawing Rights (SDR) basket will mark an important step in its multi-year effort to liberalize the capital account. We believe the possibility of future inclusion of CNY-denominated debt in key benchmarks will have a salutary effect on EM local debt as a whole.
  • Technical Strength: A shake-out of “tourist” players as a result of the negative publicity surrounding EM suggests an improved technical foundation of the investor base. With G3 central banks maintaining an accommodative bias, we believe the ground is ripe for a resurgence of interest by dedicated and crossover investors, in the context of substantive cutbacks of prior exposure. For long-term institutional investors, including sovereign wealth funds, EM local debt offers a distinctive benefit of portfolio diversification. Moreover, valuations are attractive. Currently, the GBI-EM GD yields 6.35% and has a duration of less than 5 years.
  • Secular Underpinnings: Admittedly, significant fundamental challenges have surfaced in some EM countries. Nonetheless, we believe the paradigm of fundamental improvements in EM countries remain intact, and view the correction in asset valuations as transitory. The needed shift in paradigm is that investors should no longer view EM local debt as a “sure win” proposition as some might have prior to Taper Tantrum in May 2013. The maturation process for EM countries is evolutionary, and the pace of socioeconomic progress can vary drastically from one country to another. The need to differentiate long-term credit stories among the highly diverse universe of EM countries based on their individual merits is therefore of paramount importance. Put differently, EM local debt will no longer be based narrowly on a monolithic theme of Chinese demand for commodities going forward.

As active managers, we view the heterogeneity of the asset class as a strength, not a flaw. We believe this creates a unique opportunity set to earn attractive returns, particularly given the current underallocation by long-term strategic investors. In further evaluating its appeal, we would avoid either extreme of eternal optimism or perpetual pessimism.

Returning to the onion analogy, although they may occasionally cause tears, onions are an extremely versatile and critical ingredient in a wide variety of international culinary dishes. Properly selected, we believe an allocation to EM local debt fits into the fundamental conviction of the most discerning of investor palates, given the rising strength of EM countries over a long-term investment horizon.

Past results are not indicative of future investment results. Investments are not guaranteed and you may lose money. This publication is for informational purposes only and reflects the current opinions of Western Asset Management. Information contained herein is believed to be accurate, but cannot be guaranteed. Opinions represented are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sale of any security and are subject to change without notice. Statements in this material should not be considered investment advice. Employees and/or clients of Western Asset Management may have a position in the securities mentioned. This publication has been prepared without taking into account your objectives, financial situation or needs. Before acting on this information, you should consider its appropriateness having regard to your objectives, financial situation or needs. It is your responsibility to be aware of and observe the applicable laws and regulations of your country of residence.
Western Asset Management Company Distribuidora de Títulos e Valores Mobiliários Limitada is authorised and regulated by Comissão de Valores Mobiliários and Banco Central do Brasil. Western Asset Management Company Pty Ltd ABN 41 117 767 923 is the holder of the Australian Financial Services Licence 303160. Western Asset Management Company Pte. Ltd. Co. Reg. No. 200007692R is a holder of a Capital Markets Services Licence for fund management and regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore. Western Asset Management Company Ltd is a registered financial instruments dealer whose business is investment advisory or agency business, investment management, and Type II Financial Instruments Dealing business with the registration number KLFB (FID) No. 427, and members of JIAA (membership number 011-01319) and JITA. Western Asset Management Company Limited ("WAMCL") is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"). In the UK this communication is a financial promotion solely intended for professional clients as defined in the FCA Handbook and has been approved by WAMCL. Potential investors in emerging markets should be aware that investment in these markets can involve a higher degree of risk.